|
It
was the day the Beatles appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show.
Their television debut ushered in not only a new era for rock
and roll, but something more. With the name "Ludwig" painted
on Ringo’s bass drumhead, it marked also the beginning of
the Ludwig Drum Company’s largest boom in their production
history. "Even though we stepped up our production, the orders
for our drums came in faster than we could make them," said
William F. Ludwig II who was then the company’s General Manager
and Vice President.
This
new surge in Ludwig’s production and sales coincided with
a new government regulation enacted at about the same time
(The regulation was brought to our attention by drum historian/insurance
agent, Harry Cangany). These overlapping events would intertwine
to have a direct effect on the collecting and dating of 1960’s
Ludwig drums. Prompted by the insurance industry, the new
regulation mandated serial numbers on certain goods – including
drums. (badge photo here) "Up until then," said Mr. Ludwig,
"some of our drums were date stamped and some weren’t - but
none had serial numbers. Our dealers begged us to put them
on, so we had our badge manufacturer imprint sequential numbers
on the badges for all of our drums."
With
the debut of serial numbers, Ludwig helped the dealers comply
with the new law. But unforeseen then to the drum company,
these serial numbers would also be a key to unlock the mystery
of how to date post-’63 Ludwig drums that weren’t date-stamped.
Though in actuality, the way to pin down the elusive age of
these drums would call more for the sharp pencil of a record
keeper than the skill of a Sherlock Holmes.
Motivated
by a growing number of customer inquiries about dating 60’s
era Ludwig drums, as well as our own historical interest,
we took on the task of record keeper. We began in the late
1980’s by monitoring all of the 60’s Ludwig drums that came
into our shop. Thanks to the production boom of the 60’s,
we had a large sampling of drums which provided enough data
to do our research. When we found a drum with both a serial
number and complete date stamp present, this data was entered
into a serial number index. We hoped that, in time, the index
would reveal a consistent chronological order in the serial
number sequence. The reasoning for our optimism was that since
the serial numbers were imprinted on the badges in a sequential
order (of lower to higher numbers) and since the badges were
installed over a duration of time – as represented by the
date stamps inside of the shells, a direct relationship between
the serial numbers and date stamps was inevitable, even though
the Ludwig factory did not intend it.
As
our record keeping continued and more serial numbers and dates
were added to the index, the correlation between them became
increasingly evident. Although we did find some discrepancies
in this correlation - which we'll discuss later in this article
- a general pattern emerged. The serial numbers increased
as their corresponding date stamps moved forward in time.
In
a recent conversation with Jack Lawton, restoration specialist
and owner of the Lawton Drum Company (Sudbury, PA.), I discovered
by chance that Jack had, over a 10 year period, also developed
a serial number index like ours.
We
decided to exchange and compare indexes. To our mutual relief,
we found that the serial numbers and date stamps corresponded
with one another and that the sequence of the serial numbers
in both indexes followed the same general path through time.
Let’s
have a look now at some numbers. Below is Ludwig 1960’s
Serial Number Time Chart #1. It contains particular number/date
stamp pairs chosen from our original serial number index because
they serve as good representations of the chronological trend
of the serial number sequence. By using this chart, you will
be able to know in most cases the year, and time frame within
the year, that your 1960’s Ludwig drum was made. For additional
clarification we have included a few serial number/date stamp
pairs provided by helpful collectors.
|
Ludwig
1960’s Serial Number Time Chart #1
|
|
DATE
|
SERIAL NUMBER
|
|
1960
to late 1963
|
no serial numbers
used
|
|
February
24, 1964
|
12,219
|
|
April,
1964
|
31,505
|
|
April,
1965
|
142,581
|
|
July
6, 1965
|
171,268
|
|
October,
1965
|
233,838
|
|
March
19, 1966
|
308,863
|
|
August
30, 1966
|
361,292
|
|
November,
1966
|
390,690
|
|
March,
1967
|
427,211
|
|
June,
1967
|
493,426
|
|
November
15, 1967
|
519,728
|
|
February
6, 1968
|
578,990
|
|
June
21, 1968
|
604,865
|
|
November,
1968
|
650,521
|
|
January,
1969
|
673,078
|
|
February
26, 1969
|
689,430
|
|
September
4, 1969
|
743,080
|
Here’s how to use the chart:
Taking
as an example a non-date stamped drum with the serial number
of 718,321, lets first find the proximate serial numbers to
718,321 - which are 689,430 and 743,080 respectively. Next,
check the corresponding dates to these serial numbers - which
are February 26, 1969 and September 4, 1969. These two dates
indicate the general time frame when our non-date stamped
drum was made.
Keep
in mind when using the chart that due to Ludwig’s production,
assembly and order-fulfillment procedures during the 60’s
(discussion following the next chart) it’s not uncommon to
find a moderate margin of discrepancy in the serial number/date
stamp relationship. For this reason, the production date of
the drum you’re dating could actually be several months earlier
or later than the chart indicates.
I
once asked Mr. Ludwig why only some of the shells were date
stamped? He explained, "The reasons varied over the years.
Sometimes it was because we wanted to accommodate certain
dealers who didn't want the dates. Other times it was to keep
up our production speed so that we could keep up with the
demand. And sometimes it was just because the stamp pads ran
out of ink."
|
Furthermore,
not all of the dates that went on the drums stayed on
the drums. Dick Gerlack, who recently retired from the
Ludwig Drum Company as their quality control manager/
trainer/ buyer, was with the drum company from 1960
to 2001. He pointed out to me that because Ludwig used
non-indelible ink for the stamping of the dates, some
dates were inadvertantly smudged or removed - in part
or whole – after the drums left the factory by drum
owners while cleaning their drums.
|
|
The
next Chart #2 gives an overview of the serial number sequence
as it progressed from one year to the next. Using a simple
formula, we have estimated, to the nearest thousand, the average
count of serial numbers used for each individual year between
1964 and 1969. For those of you who enjoy mathematics, the
formula is: 800,000 (the approximate aggregate of serial numbers
used 1964 through 1969 based on our serial number index),
divided by six (the quantity of years spanning 1964 through
1969), equals 133,000 (the average yearly increase in the
serial number progression).
Based
on this calculation, Chart #2 shows a cumulative yearly growth
of 133,000 serial numbers from 1964 through 1969. Since each
one of these serial numbers corresponds to one individual
drum produced, then our 133,000 yearly estimate, if correct,
would have to reconcile with Ludwig’s yearly tally of drums
produced during that same period. To verify our calculations
I asked both Mr. Ludwig and Mr. Gherlach how close our yearly
serial number estimate was to the drum company’s yearly drum
production output. Their respective answers were, "The 133,000
figure is extremely close to what we were doing" and "It’s
right in the ballpark." When using chart 2, keep in mind that
these serial numbers are close indicators only, i.e. the serial
numbers marking the beginning and ending of each year cannot
be distinctly established due to Ludwig's factory procedures
just mentioned, and the discrepancies that those procedures
caused in the serial number/date stamp-relationship.
| Ludwig
1960’s Serial Number Time Chart #2 |
|
DATE
|
SERIAL NUMBER
|
|
1960
to late 1963
|
no serial numbers
used
|
|
1964
|
0
133,000
|
|
1965
|
133,000
266,000
|
|
1966
|
266,000
399,000
|
|
1967
|
399,000
532,000
|
|
1968
|
532,000
665,000
|
|
1969
|
665,000
798,000*
|
| *
Note: At approximately the 750,000 mark in the serial
number sequence, Ludwig discontinued the brass Keystone
badge and replaced it with the blue and olive parallelogram-shaped
badge. |
To
understand the cause of discrepancies, lets go back
in time to the Ludwig factory of the 1960s. The manufacturing
division at Ludwig was divided into two basic departments:
the wood shop and final assembly. Shells were constructed,
wrapped in mylar, and date stamped in the wood shop. Then
the shells were drilled and hardware, heads and badges were
installed in final assembly.
The
date stamp didn’t determine when a shell would be sent to
assembly. "It was it’s size and finish," Mr. Ludwig explained.
"The shells were made in advance of the orders coming in.
Sometimes we had thousands of undrilled shells all stacked
up on shelves. When assembly needed a certain size shell
in a particular finish, it was pulled from the shelf and
sent off to them. We didn’t pay any attention to the date
stamps and if a shell wasn’t needed to fill an order, it
stayed on the shelf for days, weeks or months – sometimes
years.
Due
to the time lapse between when a shell was date stamped
and when the badge was installed, some of the drums assembled
on the same day with closely matching serial numbers had
date stamps that were months apart from one another It also
meant that some of the drums with production date stamps
close to one another, would have badges with serial numbers
that were tens of thousands of digits apart.
Further adding to the creation of discrepancies was Ludwig’s method of storing,
retrieving and installing badges. Mr. Ludwig explained, "Most of the time when a new shipment of badges
came in from our manufacturer, we still had a few boxes of them left in stock, so we just stacked the new
boxes in together with the old ones. When assembly needed more badges, we just took any box at random
and put it on the assembly bench. We didn’t try to keep the boxes in order or try to install badges in order by
serial numbers. Our main concern was to keep things moving.".
Since
there wasn’t any system of stock rotation whereby the boxes
were used in the order received, I asked Mr. Ludwig about
the probability of a leftover box or two stagnating for
months at the bottom of a stack. Mr. Ludwig replied, "I
would say in all likelihood that’s just what happened."
At a production rate of about 11,000 drums per month, it
meant that for each month that passed, the serial numbers
on the unused badges inside of a stagnant box would fall
11,000 digits behind the progressing sequence of serial
numbers. After a period of time, when the stagnant box was
opened and the badges went back in circulation, the serial
numbers on those badges would naturally be out of sequence
with the others. For example, when a badge that was out
of circulation for three months was eventually installed
on a drum, its serial number would be lower than, and discrepant
to, the more current badges being installed, by an amount
of 33,000 digits. Refilling the assemblers’ badge bins was
also a source of a limited amount of discrepancies. Since
the bins were not always completely empty before being refilled,
some badges remained at the bottom, stagnating there for
a period of time before finally being used.
On
one rare occasion we acquired a drum with a 1967 date stamp
and a serial number corresponding to 1965. This was a much
bigger discrepancy than any we had encountered. So, thinking
the badge was unoriginal, I inspected it’s condition and
grommet as well as the interior of the drum shell for signs
that the factory original badge had been removed and replaced
by the one on the drum. My inspection confirmed that the
badge was original. (For detailed information on inspecting
and authenticating vintage drums, see "How To Inspect A
Vintage Drum" available online at: http://www.vintagedrum.com/inspect_vd.htm)
The explanation of the cause of so large a discrepancy came
unexpectedly during one of my conversations with Mr. Ludwig
when he happened to mention this to me, "Once in a while
we found a misplaced box of badges that was overlooked and
sitting around the factory for a couple of years. So we
opened up the box and used the badges." John Aldridge, editor
of Not So Modern Drummer magazine, informed me that he had
once found a Ludwig drum with a discrepancy of 5 years between
its date stamp and serial number.
There was also a crop of late coming discrepancies that didn’t spring up until about October of 1969, when
the three decade reign of the small Keystone badge came to an end. At this time the Ludwig Drum Company
introduced their new logo, new badge and some new finishes. During this transition period, shells wrapped in
the new finishes were stored together with the older shells wrapped in the older finishes. For a limited time,
the new badges (parallelogram-shaped blue/olive color) were installed concurrently with the remaining supply
of the older Keystone brass badges. This resulted in some drums having a new finish but old badge, and
others having an old finish and new badge.
With the end of the 1960’s Keystone badge came also the close of an historic decade in music; a decade that
inspired unprecedented numbers of young people to take up a pair of sticks and learn to play the drums. The
boom of the 60’s also provided a generous supply of drums for those who, in the future, would become
interested in collecting them and preserving our heritage. Little did Mr. Ludwig know the effects their role
would have on the decades to come. Reflecting on the past he said to me, "No one thought of vintage drums
or collectors when we were making all of those drums back then. I never dreamed I’d be talking to you now
about all of this 35 years later."
©
Copyright 2002 Vintage Drum Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
|